Truecaller clashes with India's telecom regulator over anti-spam rules

Translated by a model; the original is in Russian.

· Technology
Caller-ID service Truecaller says users are increasingly ignoring and blocking calls from a special series of business numbers introduced by India's regulator. That has sparked a disagreement between the company and the authorities over anti-spam rules.

cover.svg

Truecaller, the company known for its caller-ID and spam-call blocking service, has clashed with India's telecommunications regulator over the rules for combating unwanted calls.

The point of contention is a dedicated series of numbers that the Indian authorities have set aside for commercial calls. In the regulator's design, such labeling was supposed to help subscribers distinguish business calls from fraudulent and promotional ones.

According to Truecaller, however, the effect has been the opposite of what was intended. Users are increasingly ignoring and blocking calls precisely from this business number series, treating them as potential spam regardless of who is actually calling.

That reaction from subscribers casts doubt on the effectiveness of the current scheme for labeling commercial calls and creates friction between Truecaller and the regulator, which had insisted on using the dedicated number series as a tool for fighting spam.

The situation reflects a broader problem faced by regulators around the world: attempts to formalize and label legitimate business communications often run up against users' entrenched distrust of any calls from unfamiliar or flagged numbers. Truecaller, whose business model is built on algorithms for identifying spam and number reputation, finds itself in a position where an official government initiative conflicts with behavioral patterns that have taken shape among millions of its users in India — one of the company's largest markets.

The details of the regulator's requirements and the alternatives proposed by Truecaller are not disclosed in the published report.


Source: TechCrunch

Comments

Sign in, to comment.

  • No comments yet.